These two functions suggest that the primary data storage is graph-based (I have no experience of this).ĭon't be mistaken: you will cross DBPedia but this is NOT a semantic wiki. It provides a SPARQL interface (the SQL for knowledge bases) and an RDF export. Semantic MediaWiki is an extension of MediaWiki to enrich pages with semantic informations. The linked page gives access to a geography Wiki which is a sample and the GitHub account of the project.
It would be difficult for me to advise you about a PHP solution. Is it a PHP Framework or something like that? But as far as I know, if Google loads currently Microdata/RDFA/JSON-LD, this has a very light impact on Web ranking.Ĥ. Another case for using semantic informations would be to help Web crawling. And first of all, you need to understand very well the question of the semantic Web.įor the when part, I would say when your project is backed by a large organization and when you are really familiar with the topic. There is a need for a huge infrastructure to have an effective system. An example of a simple deduction application for search engines is Google Knowledge Graph ( simple is here a blur point about structured data impacting the functionalities, not the project itself: in a few years it could become something really impressive). There are also many other advantages related to deduction (the predicate calculus topic). Take a look at the Unesco site in English, in Chinese, in Arabian: three different sites with a pure syntactic solution. The most obvious use of a semantic system is internationalization. Why ? You have several reasons for using a semantic system.
In the fourth part are a few words about DBPedia which is a project analyzing the semantics of Wikipedia articles.īut few non-semantic wikis have the quality of Wikipedia. Think about data quality: for Watson, IBM analyzed the content of Wikipedia - they talk about the UIMA architecture for that analyze. Using a semantic Wiki has the advantages of a Wiki. But for such a result, a huge infrastructure is needed. If you want to understand the deep interest of such a system, think about IBM Watson. The client could easily build its own knowledge base.
#SEMANTIC MEDIAWIKI SOFTWARE#
an RDF parser), a semantically-structured Wiki could also be easier to process by third-party software than a purely syntactic Wiki. Web crawler are in fact the main applications processing Web pages. Note: you have several standards for semantic informations (RDF/OWL, Microdata/RDFA/JSON-LD).Īt first glance, the main interest of the semantic Web is for search engines: Web pages would be easier to crawl with semantic informations. It has the advantage of a Wiki: the collaborative aspect can be precious for data quality. The semantic topic is really huge: if you are really interested then you should read a book about it.Ī semantic Wiki is simply a Wiki that takes advantage of semantics rather than syntax. An important element in predicate calculus is about data quality. Such an organization of data would have several advantages including predicate calculus (also called first-order-logic -> that article is succinct) and internationalization. introduced in a seminal article the idea that the Web would become very interesting if page terms where exposed on the semantic side as a complement to syntax informations. In 2001, Tim Berners-Lee (father of the Web) et al. This is why I can't personally understand a page in Chinese or Arabian but will guess things in Dutch or Danish: these languages are European, will have a grammar similar and an etymology close to the languages I know. The current Web is largely syntactic: a human (or system) needs to know the syntax of a language (including grammar) of a page in order to capture the meaning of the words. According to the Wikipedia article on Semantics, this is about relationships between words. The point is probably about semantics, you have an exchange about this, but I try here to summarize. To make things simple, you probably know what is a Wiki. I take a deep breath and try to explain a few things. It starts with terms such as knowledge that need a few explanations. Well, the Wikipedia article mentioned in the comments is quite theoretic.
0 kommentar(er)
